Book Report On Kill A Mockingbird - 9802 Words

LOG ENTRIES (TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD) Chapters 1-2 The chapters 1 and 2 of the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, the story begins at the beginning of summer, with the introduction of Scout and Jem two kids trying to enjoy to dog-days of summer in the plain and simple town of Maycomb. Their summer stays this way until they meet a boy by the name of Dill; Dill, Scout, and Jim play together by reenacting scenes from famous movies like Dracula. But when Dill hears about the legend of the Radley’s and there abandon estate, he becomes entranced with the Radley’s and wants to find out what really happened to Boo Radley. His interest in the Radley’s goes to such an extent that he dares Jem to get Boo Radley to leave his house by going on his property. After the deed was done summer winds down to an end as Dill leaves for Meridian, bored with nothing to look forward in summer Scout realizes that school is going to start. Jem starts to distance himself from Scout saying â€Å"Jem was careful to explain that during the school hour I was not to bother him†. Scouts starts to realize that school is different as she is punished for speaking out of turn and trying to explain why Walter cannot accept money from Miss Caroline. She takes this as an insult against Walter and punishes her, as it turns out school is a lot different than home. We get this lovely snippet about the life of the ever day average person that lives in Maycomb â€Å"People move slowly then. †¦There was no hurry, for there was nowhereShow MoreRelatedBook Report On Kill A Mockingbird, By Robert E Lee834 Words   |  4 PagesDrew Pauley Ms.Neeley English 10 6 May 2016 Title A reappearing subject in the classic book â€Å"To Kill a Mockingbird,† revolved around equality for African-Americans. Tom Robinson, an African American, was falsely convicted of rape. This problem is still relevant in today’s society. There have been recent cases that have raised awareness for true equality. White cops have been killing African-Americans and getting away with it. A boy named Tamir Rice was killed in a park for playing with aRead MoreBook Report On Of Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee1857 Words   |  8 PagesLucas Garvey Mrs. Tavares H. English 10 21 May 2016 Inequality in American Society Today The book To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee is a book based around social inequality present in Maycomb county in the 1930’s. The novel takes place in Maycomb, a small town in southern Alabama. The book is also during the 1930s depression era. Lee s novel is told from the perspective of a young girl, Jean Louise Finch, who s nickname is Scout. Scout grows up in a racist, and intricate world. She strugglesRead MoreBook Report On Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee3277 Words   |  14 PagesAnmarie Deyl English 10 Honors 23 June 2014 Summer Journal Entry: To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee Chapter 1- The foundation of Maycomb Proceeding to read and slowly unravel the story within the text was something that clearly required focus to understand Harper Lee’s message, which was one that has yet to be understood in this point in time. However, as I found myself analyzing the story, I begin to discover the foundation that Harper Lee’s story builds from. She chooses to tell this storyRead MoreA Prejudice Society in To Kill a Mocking Bird by Harper Lee745 Words   |  3 Pages To Kill a Mocking Bird follows Scout through her narration of life and witnesses the events that society produces. As Scouts understanding of the prejudice society she lives in grows her innocence is destroyed in the process. In her novel To Kill a Mocking Bird, Harper Lee symbolically uses Mocking Birds to show the destruction of innocence. A way Harper Lee presented the Mockingbirds role in society, was by asserting in the novel that to destroy its innocence, would be a sin and should notRead MoreTo Kill a Mockingbird Justice1545 Words   |  7 Pagesin To Kill a Mockingbird. Ideally, justice would be blind to race, gender or other differences yet, as shown in To Kill a Mockingbird, it isnt and for the most part, justice is not served. Many innocent characters, or mockingbirds, are subject to the injustice of the prejudice folks of Maycomb County and, consequently, are destroyed. These mockingbirds include, but are not limited to, Boo Radley, Tom Robinson, Mayella Ewell and Jem Finch. Very little Justice is served in To Kill a Mockingbird becauseRead MoreAn Unfortunate Truth: To Kill a Mockingbird717 Words   |  3 PagesIt has been over fifty years since Harper Lee wrote her classic book, To Kill a Mockingbird (TKM). â€Å"Harper Lee’s work is so powerful and popular that it has never been out of print,† (Price). Since then, the outside world has changed with significance. People wear jeans instead of slacks, pocket calculators have more computing power than the rocket that put humans on the moon, and culture is advancing faster than the rocket’s return. Through all these changes that have taken place since 1960, TKMRead MoreOf English 10. 8 May 2017. Ryan Memmer. 6Th Period. Mrs.1618 Words   |  7 Pageswriting another book, The Long Goodbye. He reported that Lee had written at least 111 pages. Lee gave permission to Patrick Cather to reprint a short essay that talked about the history of Alabama and her passion for the history in the pamphlet called Romance and High Adventure. These were the smaller publication works that Lee had published over her lifetime, but she is most known for two of her works (Schulman). The most popular works of Harper Lee are To Kill a Mockingbird and Go Set a WatchmanRead More The Life of Nelle Harper Lee Essay808 Words   |  4 Pagesto re-write her work perhaps by expanding one of the short stories into a novel. For the next two and a half years, Lee revised the work under the supervision of her editor, Tay Hohoff [6]. Finally, in 1960, Harper Lees first and only book, To Kill a Mockingbird, was published. The story, which is set in a small Alabama town during the 1930s, is narrated by Scout, a six year old girl. She tells the events surrounding a court case in which her father, Atticus Finch, defends a black man, Tom RobinsonRead MoreKill A Mockingbird By Lee Pulitzer1748 Words   |  7 PagesThe prize winning novel, To Kill A MockingBird by lee Pulitzer, has remained amazingly famous since it was distributed in 1960. As a six year old, her encounters were from a grown-up point of view. Jean Louise Finch, who is nicknamed Scout, portrays the circumstances whi ch incorporate her widowed father, Atticus, and his lawful barrier of Tom Robinson, a nearby dark man who was erroneously blamed for assaulting a white lady. In the three years encompassing the trial, Scout and her more seasonedRead MoreRacism In To Kill A Mockingbird Essay1090 Words   |  5 PagesAccording to a report from dosomething.org, in 2009, 2/3 of the criminals receiving life sentences were non-whites. This shows that racism is still going on today and in Harper Lees book, To Kill A Mockingbird. Her book takes place in Maycomb County, Alabama during the depression. The story is told by Jean Louise Finch, who goes by Scout. She lives with her brother named Jeremy Finch, or Jem, and their father named Atticus. He is an attorney and not afraid to stand up for what he believes in

The s Theory Of Internal Morality - 1852 Words

Intro Wishful blindness is a lot more common than pure dishonesty - it is when someone knowingly stays oblivious to dishonesty occurring Becker’s theory (SMORC) is that decisions about dishonesty are based on a cost-benefit analysis An increase of police and punishments won’t necessarily decrease dishonesty SMORC isn’t necessarily true because people have internal morality that also governs their decisions Taking little by little is much more common than someone taking a huge amount I know for a fact that I have looked the other way when something dishonest was going on just so that we could benefit, and at the time my conscience was convincing me that it wasn’t cheating. So I can understand how common wishful blindness really is. I’m certain that I don’t weigh the costs and benefits on everything that I do, so I tend to agree with Ariely’s theory of internal morality being more plausible than SMORC Something that I thought of about the stealing bit by bit part was the whole idea of pyramid schemes, where you take little by little from certain people and make huge amounts of profit while doing so. Chapter 1 Does a study on how students cheat using the matrix experiment Finds that many cheat by a little but few cheat by a lot When more money got involved the amount of cheating dropped (internal morality) When people were less likely to be caught the level of cheating remained the same The thought of getting caught doesn’t really affect when someone might cheat BehaviorShow MoreRelatedThe Doctrine Of The Divine Command Theory1237 Words   |  5 PagesThe Divine Command Theory dictates that â€Å"An act is morally required just because it is commanded by God, and immoral just because God forbids it (Shafer-Landau 65).† This view is often accepted by religious people as the basis for morality; the morality of an action is determined by whether or not it is commanded by God. However, there are multiple problems presented by this line of thinking. One of the most common arguments against this theory is known as the Euthyphro Dilemma, derived from Plato’sRead MoreSocialisation, Personal Identity, Gender Identity And Gender Roles1313 Words   |  6 Pagesin regards with adolescence, which is supported through the findings of Erik Erikson and Lawrence Kohlberg. Erik Erikson’s Theory: Erik Erikson (1902-1994) used Freud’s findings as a foundation to develop a theory about human stage development. During Erikson’s work from 1950-1963 he added modifications to Freud’s findings resulting in a proposition of a psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development that occurs over a human’s lifespan and encompasses all life stages of human development; infancyRead MorePositivism : The Ruling Theory Of Law944 Words   |  4 Pages(1790-1859) and HLA Hart (1907-1992). Philosopher Ronald Dworkin once described legal positivism as the ruling theory of law. Since the time of Bentham and Austin legal positivism was the dominant theory and was held by most legal scholars in one way or another and was also the working theory of most legal practitioner’s. Although recognized as a dominating jurisprudential theory with considerable influence on the writings of many legal scholars, positivism has been open to much criticism especiallyRead MoreEthical Theories Of Ethical Egoism993 Words   |  4 Pagesis a consequentialist normative ethical theory. There are two forms of ethical egoism. The first is individual ethical egoism which states that I should act in ways that are in my own best interest. The second form is universal ethical egoism which states that everyone one should act in their own best interest. In both forms, individuals should only consider others interest to the extent that it benefits their own well-being. The determination of morality is based off whether or not the consequencesRead MoreThe Second World War1598 Words   |  7 Pagesfresh debate within jurisprudence, in turn leading many to criticise the previously prominent ideas of Legal Positivism , which in layman’s terms separated law from morality and cred ited as valid law any bill provided it had gone through the recognised legislative system of a sovereign . Instead, academics moved towards modern theories of Natural Law which are built upon the principle that ‘an unjust law cannot be a valid law’. The central theme of Legal Positivism is the distinction drawn betweenRead MoreThe Christian View Of God1647 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Christian God. If God is omnipotent, He could prevent any injustice. Since injustice does exist, it is necessary to modify either our perception of God s morality of, the extent of his power, or the limitations of human understanding. It is unlikely that God allows for the existence of evil due to a moral reason. This view of morality comes from our modern interpretation of ethics and would need to justify the pain and prejudice evident in the human world, deeming it either neutral or goodRead MoreDeterminism And Its Effects On Society957 Words   |  4 Pagessince the revolutions of the human societies in thousands of years, it s not correct to say that no choices are ever made by ourselves. And the key point is that most of the causal laws were found through scientific methods, but sciences have enhanced our power on predicting and even changing the progress that will result in a different end by discovering more causal laws as time passes. Soft determinism is a philosophical theory that opposite to Hard determinism’s conclusion that people are not accountableRead MoreDeterminism, Soft Determinism And Libertarianism982 Words   |  4 Pagesourselves since the evolutions of the human societies in thousands years, it s not correct to say that no choices are ever made by ourselves. And the key point is that most of the causal laws were found through scientific methods, but sciences has enhanced our power on predicting and even changing the progress that will result in a different end by discovering more causal laws as time passes. Soft determinism is a philosophical theory that opposite to Hard determinism’s conclusion that people are not accountableRead MoreKant And Kant s Categorical Imperative1241 Words   |  5 Pagesphilosopher, had contended that the fundamental principle of morality is the Categorical Imperative, from here will be additionally labeled as (CI) or otherwise mentioned. He supported his view by suggesting a pure moral philosophy; a metaphysics of morals that is not solely for rational beings to explore different ¬ sources of basic moral principles that are found through their own observational experience a priori, but additionally for the sake of morality as it remain vulnerable to all types of corruptionRead MoreThe Distinction Between Natural Law And Legal Positivism Essay1747 Words   |  7 Pages I will make distinctions regarding advantages and disadvantages of the definitions of the theories of natural law and legal positivism. By focussing on slavery as an example I will b e looking at various theorists and their theories thereby attempting to make sense and find clarity in this regard. Furthermore to understand the aspects of natural law and legal positivism, one has to understand the theories of Cicero, Thomas Aquinas among others in regards to natural law and H.L.A. Hart, Jeremy Bentham

Joseph Louis-Gay Lussac free essay sample

He was the eldest son of Antoine Gay. Antoine Gay was a judge at Point-de-Norblac and had acquired the name Lussac a small family property in a nearby town. Gay Lussac received his early education in his hometown of Saint- Leonard. Since an early age, Gay-Lussac had a curious interest in science. He was very talented probably because one of his grandfathers had been an author, and a few of his relative were notable figures in France.In 1794, he was sent to Paris by his father in preparations for his further education in college. In 1797, after passing an admission examination, Gay Lussac was admitted into the University of Ecole Polytechnique. However, three years later, he was sent to Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees where he became a student and a research assistant to C. L Berthollet. Gay-Lussac was also appointed as the assistant to Antoine Francois Fourcroy in 1802. A while later, after Berthollet astonished by Lussac’s intelligence and science potential, Berthollet declared himself as the â€Å"father in science† to Gay-Lussac. We will write a custom essay sample on Joseph Louis-Gay Lussac or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In 1809, Gay-Lussac married Genevieve-Marie-Joseph Rojot who worked in a tailor’s shop. They had five children and the eldest son, Jules, became a laboratory assistant to Justus Liebig, a close friend to Gay-Lussac. In 1807, Gay Lussac became a member of the Socite d’ Arcueil. He became a Professor of chemistry at Ecole Polytechnique in 1809. However, Gay-Lussac kept alternating from being a chemistry professor, to being a professor of physics. As a highlight of his successful career, Gay-Lussac was elected into the Haute Vienne chamber of deputies in France in 1839. Gay-Lussac was involved in numerous scientific researches and studies.His studies included capillary action, hygrometry, properties of gases, and standard measurement of alcohol content in beverages. He worked with Pierre Simon Laplace, a close French chemist, while researching the laws of capillarity. They both made publications, and also collaborated in many researches afterwards. Although Gay-Lussac is not accredited with the study of hygrometry nor the device itself, his involvement with the atmosphere prompted him to publish his ideas and observations concerning hygrometry. A formal request to Gay-Lussac to study the effects of increasing altitude on the Earth’s magnetic field took him to the skies.In 1804, together with Jean Baptiste Biot, Gay-Lussac ascended in a hydrogen balloon in order to collect data samples of air. He also had the opportunity to investigate the composition of air at various altitudes. After testing the air samples at his laboratory, he concluded that altitude was not a determining factor in the strengthening or the weakening of Earth’s magnetic field. Gay-Lussac also found out that the composition of the different gases in air to be constant at different altitudes despite the fact that he had a headache about twenty thousand feet off the ground.Gay-Lussac’s next major study was the measuring alcohol(ethanol) concentration in alcoholic beverages. He developed an alcohol by volume standard measurement by mainly using units of volume. This standard measure showed how much alcohol was contained in an alcohol beverage by dividing the amount of alcohol (ethanol) by the volume of the alcohol beverage. The result (ABV) was finally expressed as a percentage. The percent-expression proved useful globally since all kinds of capacity units (such as litres and gallons) could be used without necessary conversion.The alchol-by-volume standard measurement has been used since his times till now. Two years after his magnetic field experiment in a hydrogen balloon, Gay-Lussac discovered the relationship between the pressure and temperature of a gas while researching on the thermal expansion of gases. He noted that when the temperature of a gas was increased, the pressure increased as well. Therefore, the relationship between the two factors, temperature and pressure, was directly proportionate. For his discovered law to function properly under correct conditions, the volume of the gas had to remain the same.

The Unprincipled Family Essay Example For Students

The Unprincipled Family Essay The Unprincipled FamilyFredrickPer8Interrelated artsThe dangerous relationship of Claudius, the king, and Hamlet, the kings nephew and stepson, contain two elements that are pervasive enough to categorize it as such. Treachery and paranoia are those traits. Treachery is one of the basic unprinciples of the relationship, as is shown in the scene of the fencing match and the planning that goes around it. In a scene that relates to the planning of the match itself, the king and Laertes, a man whose family is dead because of Hamlet, have plotted the death of Hamlet through various things. All of which are to happen to Hamlet in the course of the match:King.And wager on your heads. He, being remiss,Most generous, and free from all contriving,Will not peruse the foils, so that with ease,Or with a little shuffling, you may chooseA sword unbated, and, in a pass of practice,Requite him for your father. We will write a custom essay on The Unprincipled Family specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Laertes.I will dotAnd for that purpose Ill anoint my sword. I bought an unction of a mountebank,So mortal that, but dip a knife in it,Where it draws blood, no cataplasm so rare,Collected from all simples that have virtueUnder the moon, can save the thing from deathThat is but scratched withal. Ill tough my pointWith this contagion, that, if I gall him slightly,It may be death.(IV, vii, 134-148)So in fact, within this quote there are two foul plans, the use of an unbated foil, which is more than technically cheating in a fencing match, but then, adding insult, the use of a poison tipped foil. With the use of contagion and the unbated foil, Claudius and Laertes are making sure that they win. This is still not enough for them, however they move on to another backup scheme to win: a poisoned chalice:King.When in your motion you are hot and dry-As make your bouts more violent to that end-And that he calls for a drink, Ill have prepared himA chalice for the nonce, whereon but sipping,Our purpose may hold there. -(IV, vii, 157-162)Claudius introduc es a poisoned chalice, which, as the third option, or in better terms, the third method is used to kill Hamlet. After being stabbed by Hamlet, Laertes, in his final breaths pronounces the treachery of the king:Laertes.The treacherous instrument is in thy hand,Unbated and envenomed. The foul practiceHath turned itself on me. Lo, here I lie,Never to rise again. Thy mothers poisonedI can do no more. The King, the Kings to blame.(V, ii, 317-321)As Laertes states quite bluntly, the king is to blame. Claudius indirectly causes the deaths of almost everyone in the area of the match (fig.1)But that is not all. Claudius proves himself not only conniving, but also extremely paranoid. He believes (rightly) that Hamlet is out to get him. But even realizing that, he takes extreme measures. For example, in Act 3, scene 3, he dispatches Hamlet to England, with the ever-present Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Notably, he Hamlet has done nothing to Claudius at this point; he hasnt fought, talked harsh ly, or abused him in any way. Apparently that does not matter to Mr. Guilty-Conscience , a.k.a. Claudius, who ships him off at the first sign of trouble (madness ):King.I like him not, nor stands it safe with usTo let his madness range. Therefore prepare you. I your commission will forthwith dispatch,And he to England shall along with you. The terms of our estate may not endureHazard so nears as doth hourly growOut of his brows (III, iii, 1-7)Essentially Claudius is saying, Hes nuts! Take him away (from me!) Specifically Claudius states that he does not like the madness that Hamlet expresses, and as the only logical recourse is to send Hamlet away. Even if the previous quote is too general he states it again, to this speedy voyage(III, iii, 24) another stage to his paranoia is the fact that he spies on (III, i), or has Polonius (III, iv) spy on Hamlet. The conspiracy theories finally add up until the only way he knows Hamlets out of the way is to order him killed in secret and in seclusion from Denmark (in England). This instance is best shown by the events told by Hamlet to Horatio:Hamlet.Up from my cabin,My sea gown scarfed about me, in the darkGroped I to find out them, had my desire,Fingered their packet, and in fine withdrewTo mine own room again, making so bold,My fears forgetting manners, to unsealTheir grand co mmission; where I found, Horatio-Ah, royal knavery! -an exact command,Larded with many several sorts of reasons,Importing Denmarks health, and Englands too,With, ho, such bugs and goblins in my life,That on the supervise, no leisure bated,No, not to stay the grinding of the ax,My head should be struck off. (V, ii, 12-24)Essentially, the king had Hamlet sent to England, but on arrival wanted him killed. After this quote came the fencing match. Again the excess planning was given through the paranoiac delusions of the King. .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .postImageUrl , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:hover , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:visited , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:active { border:0!important; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:active , .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573 .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1c7835613d3844556a54903a2a1ec573:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Cheating EssayAs Hamlet and Claudius relationship progressed, the dangerous situations increased both in intensity (a progression to violence, madness) thorough confrontations, and in number. By the end of the play, their arguments become more evident as one conversation relating to the conflict happens at least once a scene. The treachery and paranoia state that danger shows the power of the most evident relationship in the play.